Karin Knapp vs Jill Craybas Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W L L W L L L
Form
L W L L W L W L L LH2H: Knapp 1 - 1 Craybas
They have played 4 sets in total, with Knapp winning 2 and Craybas winning 2. The last match between Knapp and Craybas was at the Ismaning, 22-10-2012, First, Carpet with Karin Knapp getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Karin Knapp | 1 |
| Jill Craybas | 1 |
Ismaning(22-10-2012)
6
3
6
3
| Knapp | Stats | Craybas |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 33 | Highest Rank | 39 |
| 37 | Age | 50 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 8 | Titles | 3 |
| 58% (332-244) | Career Total W/L | 46% (341-403) |
| $1,136,969 | Career Prize Money | $665,086 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 1 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Baez VS Dzumhur PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Pegula VS Lys PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-3 |
Stats 
Karin Knapp
Player
Jill Craybas
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve %
61%
(
48 of
79)
5
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
79)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
||||
| 6-4 6-2 |
Stats
Jill Craybas
Player
Karin Knapp
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
55%
(
28 of
51)
0
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
4
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
39%
(
23 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
50
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 18 | Games Won | 18 |
| 9 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 8 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 0:55:30 | Average Match Time | 0:55:30 |
| 58% (60/104) | 1st Serve % | 62% (86/138) |
| 70% (42/60) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (51/86) |
| 43% (19/44) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (26/52) |
| 38% (6/16) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 75% (6/8) |
| 44% (61/138) | Return Points Win % | 41% (43/104) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Karin Knapp Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Su-Wei Hsieh
Player
Karin Knapp
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve %
48%
(
25 of
52)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
5
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
21%
(
3 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
45%
(
17 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
50
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Johanna Larsson
Player
Karin Knapp
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
39%
(
27 of
69)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
8
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
36 of
69)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kurumi Nara
Player
Karin Knapp
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
66)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
5
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
21 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
37 of
66)
71
Total Points Won
50
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Karin Knapp
Player
Camila Giorgi
50%
(
53 of
105)
1st Serve %
57%
(
58 of
102)
7
Aces
4
11
Double Faults
11
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
40 of
58)
52%
(
27 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
36%
(
38 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
40 of
102)
107
Total Points Won
100
|
7-6(0) 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lucie Safarova
Player
Karin Knapp
53%
(
44 of
83)
1st Serve %
50%
(
38 of
76)
5
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
11
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
30 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
28 of
65)
91
Total Points Won
68
|
4-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Rebecca Peterson
Player
Karin Knapp
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve %
49%
(
17 of
35)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
63%
(
17 of
27)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
36%
(
13 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
41
Total Points Won
30
|
6-3 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Karin Knapp
Player
Cindy Burger
49%
(
46 of
94)
1st Serve %
40%
(
46 of
116)
6
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
14
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
33%
(
16 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
27 of
70)
47%
(
8 of
17)
Break Points Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
46%
(
43 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
59 of
116)
110
Total Points Won
100
|
6-4 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Julia Goerges
Player
Karin Knapp
56%
(
40 of
72)
1st Serve %
51%
(
41 of
80)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
8
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
13 of
39)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
43%
(
31 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
42 of
80)
83
Total Points Won
69
|
4-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Karin Knapp
Player
Mona Barthel
51%
(
34 of
67)
1st Serve %
67%
(
32 of
48)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
6
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
40%
(
27 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Karin Knapp
Player
Denisa Satralova
57%
(
34 of
60)
1st Serve %
59%
(
36 of
61)
4
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
7
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
42%
(
25 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
65
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Jill Craybas Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Julia Boserup
Player
Jill Craybas
61%
(
58 of
95)
1st Serve %
59%
(
61 of
104)
3
Aces
0
11
Double Faults
7
50%
(
29 of
58)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
38%
(
14 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
15 of
43)
43%
(
9 of
21)
Break Points Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
55%
(
52 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
56 of
104)
99
Total Points Won
100
|
6-3 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kristyna Pliskova
Player
Jill Craybas
80%
(
75 of
94)
1st Serve %
68%
(
62 of
91)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
65%
(
49 of
75)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
38 of
62)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
37 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
42 of
91)
99
Total Points Won
86
|
6-7(3) 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Marina Melnikova
Player
Jill Craybas
73%
(
82 of
113)
1st Serve %
74%
(
80 of
108)
2
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
2
60%
(
49 of
82)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
45 of
80)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
43%
(
49 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
52 of
108)
116
Total Points Won
105
|
6-4 6-7(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jill Craybas
Player
Magda Linette
71%
(
51 of
72)
1st Serve %
56%
(
45 of
80)
2
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
3
53%
(
27 of
51)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
50%
(
36 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
43 of
80)
79
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Oksana Kalashnikova
Player
Jill Craybas
75%
(
44 of
59)
1st Serve %
72%
(
38 of
53)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-5 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 2-6 7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58% (332/244) | Win/Loss | 46% (341/403) |
| 56% (750/579) | Sets Win/Loss | 47% (816/925) |
| 53% (6426/5791) | Games Win/Loss | 49% (7778/8209) |
| 50% (75/76) | Hard Win/Loss | 47% (177/200) |
| 64% (205/113) | Clay Win/Loss | 43% (85/112) |
| 51% (46/44) | Indoor Hard W/L | 51% (57/54) |
| 35% (6/11) | Grass Win/Loss | 37% (22/37) |
| 0.15 | Aces Per Game | 0.04 |
| 869 | Aces Total | 275 |
| 0.26 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.12 |
| 1560 | Total Double Faults | 967 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 564.87 | Average Opponent Rank | 503.77 |
| 58% (12825/22117) | 1st Serve % | 64% (15048/23422) |
| 64% (8210/12825) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (8660/15048) |
| 43% (4002/9281) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (3761/8375) |
| 48% (1247/2609) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (1313/2862) |
| 45% (9762/21623) | Return Points Win % | 45% (10398/23139) |
| 45% (25/31) | Slam W/L | 33% (27/56) |
| 42% (26/36) | Masters W/L | 48% (61/67) |
| 67% (2/1) | Cups W/L | 33% (2/4) |
| 59% (127/89) | Main Tour W/L | 46% (199/234) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 61% (125/79) | Challenger W/L | 57% (52/40) |
| 77% (27/8) | Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 58% (326/566) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 46% (335/736) |
| 50% (2/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (5/5) |
| 56% (73/131) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (84/155) |
| 51% (93/181) | Deciding Set Win % | 47% (116/249) |
| 84% (338/283) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 82% (337/277) |
| 16% (338/53) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 18% (337/60) |
| 21% (238/49) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (407/65) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
